Barack Obama A Gift To Republicans

With the troop build up in Afghanistan and never ending wars in Iraq and Pakistan. Barack Obama has fooled the American people into believing he was going to bring change to America. Becoming the first African American commander n chief he is know the new emporer of the so called "free world". He maintains colonial occupation in many parts of the world and continues to deliver weapons of mass destruction across the globe. With no end in sight out of this endless murder spree he has recieved the nobel peace prize. A totally mockery of what peace should be and what peace should look like. Barack Obama is not a symbol of change but a symbol of deciet. What will we do when the nuclear bomb can no longer be stopped? Barack Obama administration has been even more radical than the Bush Administration. Calling for a nuclear umbrella in the middle east. As long as Americans have a one party system, a plutocratic system, Americans will continue to serve as cannon foddler for there masters of war.

General

Lets not forget that our military targeted Al-Jazeera. In Iraq we had another way in controlling the media. Promoting other media sources that differ from Al-Jazeera perspective. Nothing about that references to us a moral high ground for you. And by the way if the News Channel breaks the law by not sending an government message. They are to be closed down that is no different than any American media source. There is no freedom of the press in the United States. CNN/Fox News are these your freedom of the press sources? Please lady neither of these two main stream news sources are media. They are both political propaganda in support of our corporate one party system. You can't tell me that I am wrong in point this out hun. In fact President Barack Obama administration took on Fox News. Members of Barack Obama administration considered Fox News as the arm of the Repubican party. They described it as a political tool for the republican party. So do we really have have real news or real freedom of the news? You need to dig a little deeper before you hit replie. There is nothing humane in keeping thousands of troops across the globe. There is nothing humane about keeping troops in Puerto Rico, Japan, Germany, Honduras, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan. Luckily for Lebanon they were able to repell the invadors that's when our former president Reagan pulled out the troops in that country. There is nothing humane at the extent in which we spend billions of dollars on the military industry. While millions starve we create machines of destruction and death. How many people just civilians have died in Iraq? You can't talk to me about human rights when you stopped counting the bodies of the dead in that country and others. That is savage and backward and there has been nothing more savage than the genocide of millions of muslims, including kids and women. To me human rights are a god given right, who are we to incarcerate and hold people indefentely at Guantanamo Bay (Cuba) prison? Without being able to speak to a lawyer or family members? These people are not animals but our empire treats human kind as such. HARRP is a weapon in which our military has been working on. We are not exporting terror to other countries nor are we invading other countries. In Puerto Rico our American planes flew and a heavy missile landed on Puerto Rico buildings. Utuado was the name of the little pueblo. Here your bombs sprung terror across my lands. Just as the Spaniards who came and slaughtered millions of Tainos. Today the technology of exporting terror is different but the cruel and savage methods are still the same. You can't talk to me about morality your bombings in Vieques polluted and destroyed life on the small island. You savaged the coral reefs which breed new life into our waters. Our people to this stay have a high cancer rate and your ammunition still lay cemented within the soil. You can still sense the victim (young security guards body)which died from your artillery shell. There is nothing morally right about war or those who choose to advocate for it. Title me with what you like discredite me as much as you would like. But you can't descredite the will for human kind to want to survive. It is this small will that can never be conquered.

"End Game"Brzezinski on the Afghan war

Brzezinski "endgame" will eventually does not take into account the human factor. The will to survive which is an element that all human kind has will eventually prosper. No matter the situation the human species has a natural will to survive. So no matter what Pons on the chess board Brzezinski makes it will eventually lead to failure. The will of different nations to expel there puppet leaders, are Pon move that will eventually leave empires in collapse. Eventually the American decline will foster anarchism in the world. Uprooting all imperial yokes from each nation and fostering new ones. The world Pons will shuffle and what once was a King and Queen will no longer be. That in return will disappoint Brzezinksi "endgame" and eventually the Pons on the board will no longer exist. Imperialist countries will fall and colonial countries will prosper. But it will depend on humanity to recreate the game of chess to one that will serve all human kind. Not just one group who believe in the divine right to rule over others.

This is chess, not checkers, these are warning shots-Curtis Jackson

Why Darwin Evolution Theory is Wrong

Darwin studied the way in which different species evolved in different regions. He was able to study different animals that lived in different parts of the world. Darwin theory was that the animals where evolving do to different circumstances. These circumstances involved the animal’s natural surroundings. Darwin detailed evolution by different complex adaptations of different species. But what Darwin failed to acknowledge was the very de-evolution of dinosaurs. The pre-historic giants that roamed the earth existed because of their natural habitat. When that habitat no longer existed it made the dinosaurs disappear. Not only disappear but leave some remnants of their ancestors on earth. Which are much smaller in size and are no way near the size of their former species. This would mean that the habitat in which we all live was full of life. The amount of forestation and other resources available to mass herds was enough to sub stain the dinosaurs. De-evolution occurred when the amount of environmental adaptation was no longer able to sub stain life on earth. The dinosaurs quickly started dying out and the resources on earth have been in decline since. So in return his theory is wrong about his evolutionary process. We are not evolving we are de-evolving.

United States Increases Global Arms Sales

The Israeli press has recently reported that the United States will be providing arms sales to its Middle Eastern partners. In an attempt to discourage Iran and any Al-Qeada threats the United States is increasing terrorism around the world. Israel shouldn't be the only one concerned about violent repercussions. The United States in a path of collision and it continues to export terrorism around the world. Just like the situation in Afghanistan after the fall of the pro-soviet union that created cells of terror. The United States is once again creating the same conditions in Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Egypt. Eventually these countries will have active cells that will carry out terrorist activities in the United States. Israel has signed an arms deal with the United States in 2010 in order to deter Iran from attacking. But the United States is using the same old soviet era tactics to win the war against Islam. The difference between the covert operations as the soviets is that before the double agents just mislead each other on intelligence information. This time a slight mistake can end up in a double agents attempt in detonating a bomb and blowing up in your face. Israel has the right reason to be worried about United States arming its Middle Eastern partners. But it’s not just because the Middle East might turn into hot spots for active networks against Israel national interest. The situation also describes Israel long term situation with neighboring countries. Israel is hostile with American allies which creates a division with the United States. At the same time Israel wants weapons it wants to deter the United States in providing arms to certain Middle Eastern partners. The build up in arms to each of these countries in 2010 should lift eyebrows. In recent reports the CIA has caught an Iranian trying to buy weapons from Georgia. It is evident that the two sides are setting up a collision course with each other.

1. The United States is creating exporting and arming future terror networks against its own national interest.
2. Israel future will eventually be its own down fall if a one state solution is not found with the people of Palestine. Israel future will fail if it continues its aggressive posture in the Middle East.
3. The United States axes with moderate nations will eventually backfire.
4. A war with Iran will stagnate American economic development and creates more terrorism. Israel attack on Iran will increase world tension and create retaliation disproportionate to recent Al-Qaida activity.
5. End Game-America Economic power collapsing along with creating more hot spots around the world that will target both Britain and the United States.

The American Dream

When Pan Handling in America becomes a job it’s become the American Dream. It’s hard to avoid people when everyone in America is asking for a quarter. The American dream looks like a nightmare when everyday there are millions of people begging for money. It’s so common that the daily operations have become a job. In some streets you might have a couple of guys working together with regular work schedules. Each member has a certain shift in order to ask for money. On the nitty gritty streets of America a country so wealthy still can't even deal with their own impoverished people. While millions of jobs are moving abroad homelessness and poverty is a common seen. With billions of dollars spent on the military there is no wonder why America has yet to solve its problem on poverty.

The Panama Canal and US Objectives?

A long history of US intervention in the region should place every member of ALBA to take key note of US interest in the Panama Canal. A nation who continues to do business with Colombia, Mexico, and Afghanistan should really be understood as a key trafficking point. The fact that the former President was so interested in protecting the Panama Canal should raise eye brows. Why would the U.S. be so interested in covering the Panama Canal with so many nations? Could it be that from Colombia towards Panama and then Mexico the traffic of goods reaches the United States? The members of ALBA should demand that the Panama Canal be closed. In order to reduce the trafficking of illicit drugs region. We are coming to grips that the biggest dealer of guns, interventionism, and money is the United States. The former President of the United States Mr. George Bush was highly motivated to sign the PSI act. This allowed SOUTHCOM to project US power and influence in the region specifically targeting the Panal Canal.


Bush Family connected to Bin Laden Family, drugs, opium

Below is the link:
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/09_18_01_bushbin.html

SOUTHCOM GENERAL FROSTY IS BACK

SOUTHCOM commander is going to Paraguay. Visiting military facilities and training center for so called "Peacekeeping Operations". The centers are recieving aid from the US along with training. The purpose is to increase countries ability for "stabilization operations". SOUTHCOM general met with U.S. Ambassador to Paraguay Liliana Ayalda in order to create interagency coordination and defense cooperation activities. The "SOUTHCOM’s Humanitarian Assistance Program" should also be an alarm for members of the ALBA alliance. Not only is the U.S. congress involved in providing "humanitarian" aid but SOUTHCOM is dealing with government directly.

The World at War

The way in understanding the United States imperial objectives is to understand their objectives in Iran. Condoleezza Rice in 2006 proclaimed that there were a couple of ways in dealing with Iran. Below is a list of ways in which the United States will attempt to penetrate Iran. The United States lust for world domination has only awakened the masses in the world stronger than ever. These key ingredients are what some Latin America nations need to look out for. In Fidel Castro reflections he acknowledges that the empire is on the offensive. If it continues on its path to destruction another possible world war can be concluded.

There was, for many years, a split in the administration of George W. Bush in regards to US policy towards Iran. On the one hand, there was the hardliner neoconservative element, led by Dick Cheney, with Rumsfeld in the Pentagon; who were long pushing for a military confrontation with Iran. On the other hand, there was Condoleezza Rice as Secretary of State, who was pushing for a more diplomatic, or “soft” approach to Iran.



In February of 2006, Condoleezza Rice introduced a new Iran strategy to the Senate, “emphasizing the tools of so-called soft diplomacy. She called for ramping up funding to assist pro-democracy groups, public diplomacy initiatives, and cultural and education fellowships, in addition to expanding U.S.-funded radio, television, and Internet and satellite-based broadcasting, which are increasingly popular among younger Iranians.” She added that, “we are going to work to support the aspirations of the Iranian people for freedom in their country.” There were three main facets to the program: “Expanding independent radio and television”; “Funding pro-democracy groups,” which “would lift bans on U.S. financing of Iran-based nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), trade unions, human rights groups, and opposition candidates”; and “Boosting cultural and education fellowships and exchanges,” which “would help pay Iranian students and scholars to enroll in U.S. universities.”[52]

-http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16535


Barack Obama has not changed course and in fact he has increased Bush policies. The Empire is reckoning havoc all across the globe. Let us see into a distant future and prevent a catastrophic apocalypse.

Breaking News: CNN Wolf Blitzer former lobbyist for AIPAC?!

Wolf Blitzer was born on March 22, 1948 in Buffalo, New York. He is the son of Jewish refugees from Poland. He grew up in Buffalo, New York. Blitzer graduated from Kenmore West Senior High School and received a B.A. degree in history from the University at Buffalo in 1970. In 1972, he received an M.A. degree in international relations from the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies. Blitzer began his career in journalism in the early 1970s in Tel Aviv, Israel. In 1973, Blitzer began to work for the Israeli daily, Jerusalem Post. While still employed by the Israeli newspaper Jerusalem Post, Blitzer began to work for the Zionist regime's Political Action Committe (AIPAC) in the mid 1970s, the most powerful pro-Israel lobby group in Washington, D.C. Blitzer continued to work with the Israeli newspaper Jerusalem Post until 1990. He has been a CNN reporter since 1990. Blitzer is currently the host of the newscast The Situation Room and the Sunday talk show Late Edition. Blitzer previously hosted Wolf Blitzer Reports, which was replaced by The Situation Room. Blitzer's career is a representative example of the well-engineered process through which the U.S. national government and its mass media have been hijacked and held hostage by AIPAC & supporters of the apartheid Zionist regime of ethnic cleansing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_Blitzer

Barack Obama "Nobel Peace Prize"

What is scary about his speech is the fact that he believes that in order to gain peace you need war. But what is even more scarier is the fact that with three wars going on in the middle east. He has stated that he is just starting. When he mentioned that in his speech he blew me away literally. It was as if he planned to execute the biggest military operation the world has ever seen. Barack Obama acknowledged that he needed war to bring peace. But what really stood out from his speech was when he mentioned that he was just starting. Wow. If this is just starting I would hate for people to find out what he would mean when we are half way there. His words should be taken literally and this is no fucking joke. The joker is full of smiles but that's not all he has.

The Joker: See, I'm a man of simple tastes. I like dynamite, and gunpowder...

LETS BRING OSCAR LOPEZ AND CARLOS ALBERTO TORRES HOME

Type: Meetings - Convention
Network: Global
Date: Saturday, December 12, 2009
Time: 10:00am - 2:00pm
Location: HOSTOS COMMUNITY COLLEGE






We are making a call to all Puerto Rican and other community leaders for the support in the release of the Puerto Rican political prisoners, Carlos Alberto Torres and Oscar Lopez. Both are serving close to 30 years in prison under the charges of seditious conspiracy for their involvement in the Puerto Rican Independence movement. Due out in 2023 and 2024, their sentences are clearly disproportionate and have already served longer sentences than people convicted of murder, rape, robbery and other crimes. In 1999, President Clinton granted conditional pardon to 11 of their other compatriots after serving 16 and 20 years in prison as a result of a successful international campaign which included support from President Jimmy Carter, the late Coretta Scott King and Bishop Desmond Tutu. WE NEED TO BRING OUR COMPAÑEROS HOME!!!



The National Boricua Human Rights Network will be hosting an organizers' conference on December 12th in order to advance the national campaign for the release of the Puerto Rican Political Prisoners. We will have workshops discussing ways to further organize, re-energize and campaign for the release of the prisoners. At this event community leaders will have the opportunity to publicly announce their support by endorsing our petition to President Barack H. Obama. We hope you could be one of them.

A message to the Guardian

Guardian I think that image you have about people protesting in Venezuela doesn't need to be on your cover spot. You should change it to the massive protest they are having in Honduras against the coup regime. That is being really bais in terms of having a balance in news reporting. Also Britain has a history of wanting Oil. Look at Iran and the Shah and Britain is just trying to cover its end. If any criminal convictions proceed Britain doesn't want to be caught in the cross hairs of the international community. So now they blame there counter part the United States Empire. They could care less about the environment. Do you really believe that with all the drum beating that these guys cared about the environment? The United States still uses cluster bombs just look at the after affects in Vietnam. But lets get to gangsta shit when the mobilized there troops to protect the oil fields. Who is the benificaries of those Oil fields? Certaintly not the Iraqi people when foreign government agents are bidding on its resources. Just to keep intacked the free market global world. They allow companies from other countries to enrich themselves from the left overs like pigs. The environmental destruction has had a devastating affect on the region. Cholera and other horrible medical conditions exist in Iraq. Britain past history also shows its plans in controlling that part of the region. In the begining there was one murderer her name was Lady Liberty. In the end there was a consiparcy of murderers from the Queen/Kings of Britain to the "Communist" in China. And all through the fire and smoke a child left behind weeped and no one else saw. But I seen them and through the cloud of smoke I brought them light and hope.

Breaking News:United States Navy Eyes Iran Naval Force

The United States naval force is keeping a sharp eye out on Iran Naval capacity and ability. The United States is currently studying Iran Naval capacity even more aggressively. They acknowledge that Iran is planning to expand its naval reach. They also acknowledge that Iran Naval forces is the bulk of there defenses. The recent United resolution will leave an open door for those who want to use military means as an option. The recent study of Iran Naval capablities is another sign that the United States military will target Iran Naval forces. The small qoute below describes United States naval understanding of Iran capabilities.

Outlook
Subtnarines be equipped with torpedoes, naval mines, and
Submarines will probably remain a key feature missiles. According to Iran, the QA'EM will
of Iran's naval order of battle. Iran is the only be capable of carrying out both defensive and
country in the Persian Gulf region with sub- offensive operations.
marines, and Iranian naval leaders have stated
publicly that they believe submarines are a bet- Additionally, the IRIN Commander, Rear
ter value than other weapons systems. The late Admiral Sayyari, announced the production
Rear Admiral A.shkbus Daneh-Kar wrote that of a submarine of more than 1,000 tons. This
Iran "calculated the deterrent value of subma- may be yet another submarine for the IRIN in
rines--submarines could, on a purely self- addition to the QA'EM.
sufficient basis, detect surprise attacks launched
from far distances and abort them."12 Surface Ships
In keeping with this focus on submarines, in
August 2008 Iran reported that the Ministry
of Defense's Marine Industries Organization
inaugurated the production line of the
QA'EM-class submarine, reportedly a 450-ton
submarine. Iran has stated that this new generation
submarine will be built in Iran and will
Model of a QA'EM-class coastal ,ubruari,,"I
Iran has constructed what it calls the MO\\jclass
destroyer-in fact a corvette-that, once
accepted into service, will probably be employed
in the IRlN's operating area in the Gulf
of Oman. More construction of larger ships
has occurred in the Caspian. Iran announced
that it began a production line of the MO\\j-2
at Bandar Anzali. Also in the Caspian, Iran
has built four copies of its COMBATTANTE
II-class guided missile patrol boat. These construction
programs demonstrate Iran's ability
to produce mid- to large-size ships. Coupled
with Iran's continuing interest in self-sufficiency,
these ship-building programs will likely be followed
by others.
The IRIN is also retrofitting older surface
combatants with upgraded weapons systems.
12Dane/z-Km; .AJ"/zlbl/J; Re(ff .Admiral, "Operational Doctn"ne qftlzeJlao/ qft/ze hlamic Republic qf lrrm, "Sqff, iJ"we}/o. 238, Pi'- 10-12
24
For example, in 2008 Iran announced that it
had installed missiles on one of its patrol craft,
turning it into a guided missile patrol craft.
Iran also substantially upgraded the PF-103-
class patrol ship NAGHDI with missiles. This
type of retrofitting will allow the IRIN to
extend the usefulness of its aging fleet.
In contrast to the IRIN, the IRGCN has concentrated
on acquiring and developing small,
fast boats, some lightly armed and others
armed with missiles and torpedoes, and will
probably continue this trend.
Weapons
Naval modernization is one of Iran's highest
military priorities and the country continues to
focus on weapons acquisition and development
programs. Programs of interest include expanding
inventories of existing weapons systems and
increasingly sophisticated systems. Weapons,
such as the Hoot supercavitation high-speed
missile torpedo, may be proliferated throughout
the Iranian naval inventory, as will longer
range anti-ship cruise missiles, such as the
Ra'ad. Finally, given the importance of mining
to Iranian naval strategy, some effort will
continue in this area as well.
Changes in Strategy
Iran's naval forces are unlikely to make wholesale
changes to their naval strategy. However,
it is clear that Iran will modify its strategy
when appropriate. Rear Admiral Daneh-Kar
noted that Iranian planners would review and
revise their operational doctrine based on lessons
learned from past and current operations,
as well as on the capabilities of new weapons
systems entering the service. He continued,
"We cannot develop the Navy's operational
doctrine in isolation."13
Recent activity bears witness to some of this
adaptation. IRIN commander Rear Admiral
Sayyari has stated that the IRIN will push
operations further out into the Gulf of Oman
and even the Indian Ocean to protect Iran's
maritime interests, and, as mentioned earlier,
Iran claims its naval forces are conducting extended
patrols. A decade hence may see more
frequent IRIN patrols in the north Arabian
Sea or Indian Ocean. To support this, the
IRIN has a plan to establish new naval bases
along the Gulf of Oman by 2015 and strengthen
its presence outside the Strait ofHormuz.
The IRGCN will likely continue to patrol and
operate inside the Persian Gulf, a place where
Rear Adru.iralHabibollah Sayyari, COIllIllander of the
IRIN, in front of a poster depicting IRIN naval platfoTIlls
HDanelz-Km; .AJ"/zlbuJ" Nar .Admiral, "OpnationaiDoctnne iftlze )lacy if the hlamic Republic if fTan, "Sqff, iJ"J"/uJIo. 235, Pi'- 32-35.
25
its asymmetric tactics and numerous platforms
are at an advantage. However, its modernization
efforts may provide it with more sophisticated
platforms.
Conclusion
«The countries if this region have a sensitive strategic
and geopolitical situation and the Islamu Republic if
Iran can play a considerable role among these countries.
»
General Mohammad-Baqer ,<:plqadr
Former Deputy Commander
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
Iran sees itself as a regional power, and its
naval forces, the IRIN and the IRGCN, plan
to support this view as they work to expand
both their weapons inventories and their
capabilities. According to Iranian officials,
"extra-regional" forces are neither welcmne
nor necessary in the waterways ofthe Middle
East, and the Iranian armed forces have
"proven during these 30 years of the revolution
that they are ready to defend the territory
of their country."14

Follow link below:

href="http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/oni/iran-navy.pdf

They Fear Us Because We Don't Fear Them!!!!!!

They see us laugh, fight, love!!!!!!

But we don't fear the military coup leaders and arms..!!!!!!!!!!!

Nuestra America

 

Real News Network:Latin America Multipolar Worlds and stirs Anger on Imperial and Colonial Powers

Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's visit to Brazil has sparked debates and observations all over the world as Luis Inacio Lula de Silva shows the real possibilities of a new, multipolar world. Brazil is becoming a real example of diplomacy, and of course the major powers are angry. Lula defends Iran's nuclear rights and is calling on Western powers to dump the idea of cornering Iran with threats. The question is if the world powers are willing to listen to Lula's advice.

Bangin on the Empire

The Honduras situation hasn't changed and in fact the United States Empire has strengthened the Latin American countries stance against imperialism. Every country in the continent of Latin America and the Caribbean are noticing the United States attacks on democracy. The United States diplomatic chess move on Honduras has failed and its imperial attempt in Afghanistan has failed. This so called "democracy" chess move is a disguise of the empire.




http://hondurasenlucha.blogspot.com/

Honduras: isolated, de factos prepare for vote
Submitted by WW4 Report on Tue, 11/24/2009 - 22:59. Guatemalan foreign minister Haroldo Rodas announced Nov. 21 that Guatemala was not going to recognize the general elections to be held in Honduras Nov. 29 under the de facto regime installed after the June 28 removal of President Manuel Zelaya. He added that Guatemala would not send observers to the elections. Spain is also planning not to send observers because it "cannot support" elections under these conditions, foreign ministry sources told the Spanish wire service EFE Nov. 21.

Many Latin American governments have rejected the plan to proceed with the elections, although it is supported by the US. The presidents of two of the nations with the largest economies—Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Argentine president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner—confirmed on Nov. 18 that their governments would not recognize the elections if they are held under the coup regime. Ecuador has the same position, according to Foreign Minister Fander Falconí. Organization of American States (OAS) general secretary José Miguel Insulza has said that that organization can't send observers because the representatives of Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Nicaragua and Venezuela indicated at a special meeting at the beginning of November that their governments wouldn't recognize the elections.

Despite the boycott, a delegation of 250 election observers has been put together. It will include two former center-right Latin American presidents: Vicente Fox Quesada of Mexico (2000-2006) and Alejandro Toledo of Peru (2001-2006). The main Guatemalan business group, the Committee of Commercial, Industrial and Financial Associations (CACIF), has agreed to participate. (Vos el Soberano, Honduras, Nov. 21 from EFE; ADN.es, Spain, Nov. 21 from EFE; Radio YVKE Mundial, Venezuela, Nov. 22; Reuters, Nov. 18)

On Nov. 20 Esdras Amado López, director of the Cholusat Sur Canal 36 television station, said his channel was "off the air because its signal has been interrupted with a signal from a parallel transmitter" playing "pornographic films and some westerns." "[T]errorists paid by the government of [de facto president Roberto] Micheletti" are responsible, according to López. He wrote National Telecommunications Commission (CONATEL) head Miguel Angel Rodas asking for his "immediate attention to an extremely delicate matter taking place in the moment during which Honduras is getting ready to be present at an electoral process in which freedom of the press is an important bastion for legitimizing the process."

Canal 36 and Radio Globo are the two largest broadcast media that have opposed the coup. The de facto government shut down both of them temporarily in the first days of the coup. (EFE, Nov. 20; Vos el Soberano, Nov. 20; Honduras Coup 2009 blog, Nov. 20)

On the weekend of Nov. 21 the Committee of Relatives of Disappeared Detainees in Honduras (COFADEH), one of the country's leading human rights organizations, warned of a deterioration in the human rights situation as the elections approached. COFADEH reported that there was an unusual deployment of soldiers, police agents and paramilitary groups in the country and that the military had acquired new equipment, including an armored car, a powerful water cannon and a chemical that would enable the authorities to identify anyone hit by the water for 48 hours. The group called for the international community to stay on alert about the situation. (Vos el Soberano, Nov. 22 from Defensoresenlinea.com; Prensa Latina, Nov. 22)

http://ww4report.com/node/7999

The recent developments show Mexico former president Vicente Fox supporting the Honduras coup. This should be condemned immediately and the people of Mexico should hold massive solidarity protest with the people of Honduras. In 2006 a leftist running president election was stolen by the corrupt Mexican government. The leftist candidate has publicly suggested that his country is being controlled by a mafia. The Mexican people should hold massive protest based on election fraud in their own home country and in solidarity with Honduras. They both have something deeply in common when it comes down to democracy.

Denouncing Luis Fortuno Attack against Chavez

It recent day's the government of Luis Fortuno has decided to break ties with Venezuela. All news media sources mostly controlled by the United States or waging a propaganda war against the popular Chavez. Below there links to different article's and youtube videos of the propaganda. I denounce the media campaign against my brother Chavez and will personally see that we intesify our operations against the propaganda. Paz.




http://pr.indymedia.org/news/2009/11/40136.php


Gobierno lanza campaña sucia contra la disidencia ...y contra Chávez
por Guillermo Morejón Flores Thursday, Nov. 19, 2009 at 1:52 AM
g.morejon88@hotmail.com

La inagotable ridiculez e ineptitud propia del provincialismo político que caracteriza a nuestro gobierno colonial ha movido a sus voceros a poner las miras de su esperpéntica campaña difamatoria, sobre un blanco inesperado: el Presidente de la República Bolivarianda de Venezuela, Hugo Chávez.

Gobierno lanza campa...

Tras poco menos de un año de haber sido electo con una mayoría avasalladora, el gobernador colonial de turno en Puerto Rico, abogado corporativo y republicano Luis G. Fortuño Burset y su gobierno han desatado una campaña sucia en contra los sectores que luchan ante el tsunami (que no oleada) de políticas neoliberales que le han ido cayendo arriba al pueblo puertorriqueño y que en enero de 2010 habrá logrado dejar en la calle a más de 25,000 empleados públicos. Su mayor logro, cosa que no es fácil: aglutinar a la gran mayoría del país en contra del gobierno ―el nivel de aprobación de Fortuño actualmente es de menos del 30%―, en pie de lucha y de camino a la huelga general. Y José Figueroa Sancha, Superintendente de la Policía de Puerto Rico, ex Director del FBI en San Juan y escogido por Fortuño, ha demostrado ya en más de una ocasión su disposición a ejercer la represión contra las manifestaciones del pueblo. En éste marco de total desprestigio, los medios de comunicación de mayor alcance se han hecho eco de la campaña sucia del gobierno, criminalizando y demonizando sistemáticamente al estudiantado y la juventud en general, al independentismo, los movimientos sociales y a los trabajadores, a quienes el gobierno amenazó el pasado 15 de octubre, día en que hubo un paro nacional, con acusar de terrorismo tal como se contempla en la llamada “Acta Patriota”, o Patriot Act, infame ley antiterrorista aprobada por el gobierno de Bush al calor de los ataques del 11 de septiembre de 2001.

Como si no bastara con las declaraciones del Secretario de Estado, Kenneth McClintock, en las que afirmó que el paro nacional del 15 de octubre no eral realmente un «paro nacional», propiamente dicho, más bien se trataba de un paro “estatal, territorial, insular” puesto que “aquí no va a haber nadie en Cincinnati ni en Seattle parando labores”; la inagotable ridiculez e ineptitud propia del provincialismo político que caracteriza a nuestro gobierno colonial ha movido a sus voceros a poner las miras de su esperpéntica campaña difamatoria, sobre un blanco inesperado: el Presidente de la República Bolivarianda de Venezuela, Hugo Chávez.

Los medios masivos han redoblado las “noticias” contra el líder venezolano con las consabidas acusaciones de “guerrerista”, de dictadorzuelo autócrata, de Venezuela como un narco-Estado corrupto. Entre esos medios, los dos periódicos de mayor tirada del país: “El nuevo día” y “Primera hora”, ambos pertenecientes a la familia Ferrer, tradicionalmente ligada al Partido Nuevo Progresista ―que actualmente ostenta el poder― desde sus inicios. En la pantalla chica, Univisión (canal 11) y la NBC (canal 2) hacen acto de presencia en ésta carnavalesca comparsa anti-chavista. Y el programa noticioso del canal del Estado (canal 6) haría lo propio, de no haber sido eliminado recientemente por el gobernador Fortuño y sus recortes presupuestarios.

¿Pero cómo se logra entremezclar e implicar a Hugo Chávez en el ascendente desprestigio del gobierno colonial? Goebbels se sonrojaría. El 18 de noviembre, con acusaciones que evocan a la época del Libertador, Simón Bolívar, cuando el gobierno colonial ―entonces español― acusaba al independentismo puertorriqueño de ser un germen importado de Venezuela; el senador anexionista y de origen cubano Roberto Arango declaró ante la prensa tener pruebas de que el gobierno venezolano está financiando a grupos disidentes dentro del país. Declaró, además, que tiene intenciones de redactar una resolución en el Senado de Puerto Rico solicitándole al Presidente de los EE.UU., Barack Obama y a la Secretaria de Estado, Hillary Clinton el considerar la posibilidad de cerrar el consulado venezolano en la Isla con motivo de la supuesta financiación a grupos disidentes. “Crear inestabilidad política y crear anarquía en Puerto Rico a través de subvencionar estos grupos en nada es parte de la responsabilidad de los consulados. Los consulados están para traer negocios”, aseguró.

Los comentarios escandalosos del senador Arango vienen a reforzar otra noticia de la campaña sucia que surgió el día anterior. El 17 de noviembre varios periódicos y canales de televisión difundieron la noticia de que que el gobernador lanzó una advertencia a Hugo Chávez ya que éste alegadamente afirmó, en declaraciones que no han podido ser confirmadas aún por ningún medio, que “cuenta con aliados para que Puerto Rico deje de ser una colonia”. Ante las supuestas declaraciones, Fortuño respondió tajantemente con expresiones como: “Nosotros decidimos nuestro estatus, nosotros escogemos quiénes son nuestros gobernantes. No le corresponde a nadie fuera de Puerto Rico escoger por nosotros. Y no lo vamos a permitir”. Palabras bastante grandes si tomamos en cuenta que Puerto Rico es todavía una colonia yanqui y que, encima, el susodicho pertenece al anexionista y asimilista Partido Nuevo Progresista.

No es secreto ni es noticia el apoyo decidido y reiterado a nuestra Independencia por parte del Presidente Hugo Chávez, ni son nuevos los consiguientes comunicados de prensa del partido anexionista condenándole con la paradójica noción de que “aquí mandamos los puertorriqueños”. Pero resulta todavía más paradójico que el gobernador Fortuño, a partir unas declaraciones hasta ahora fantasmas, le acuse por ello de intromisión cuando éste se dedicó a desprestigiar en varias ocasiones la figura del Presidente Chávez y del gobierno venezolano mientras ocupaba el cargo de Comisionado Residente en Wáshington (representante puertorriqueño ante la Cámara de Representantes de EE.UU., sin derecho a voto) durante el cuatrienio 2004 a 2008. Además de distinguirse por multiplicar significativamente su caudal durante su gestión; de ser el representante número cuatro con más ausencias en la Cámara según un estudio del no muy liberal Washington Post, y de despilfarrar una suma de 3.3 millones de dólares en calidad de sueldo para dieciséis “asesores legislativos”; Fortuño encontró tiempo para presentar cuatro resoluciones ante aquella Cámara donde parecía demostrar preocupación por los derechos humanos y libertad de prensa del pueblo venezolano, y censuraba el accionar de su gobierno en una amplia gama de asuntos: desde las relaciones con Cuba, la adopción del nombre “República Bolivariana de Venezuela” y la no-renovación de concesión a la golpista RCTV. Todas las medidas, en su mayoría presentadas conjuntamente con representantes de Florida, fueron rechazadas por esa Cámara.

Para lo que no halló tiempo, evidentemente, fue para elevar a nivel de la Cámara de Representantes, en nombre de los derechos humanos, la indignación que arropó a puertorriqueños de todos los espectros políticos con la vil ejecución de Filiberto Ojeda Ríos, Responsable General de la organización clandestina revolucionaria Ejército Popular Boricua (EPB-Macheteros) el 23 de septiembre de 2005, día en que el independentismo conmemoraba la primera proclamación de la República. Éste fue cocido a tiros en su casa por agentes estadounidenses del FBI (habiendo numerosas oficinas de campo de esa dependencia federal en nuestro país) mientras cipayos del patio les custodiaban el perímetro. Se le negó asistencia médica y fue dejado en el piso de su casa a desangrarse como un perro atropellado. Tampoco encontró, el señor Fortuño, tiempo para redactar una resolución, en honor a la libertad de prensa, exigiendo que se investigasen los sucesos acaecidos el 10 de febrero de 2006 donde agentes también estadounidenses del FBI allanaron los hogares de varios independentistas y, en uno de los lugares intervenidos, atacaron desvergonzadamente a periodistas que se habían personado a cubrir la noticia, empujándoles y rociándoles con gas pimienta por alegadamente violar un perímetro. Ante el estupor de la comunidad internacional y la preocupación de organismos como Amnistía Internaconal, entre otros, absolutamente nadie ha sido procesado ni investigado por éstos crímenes. Todos perpetrados por el gobierno federal contra el pueblo puertorriqueño mientras nuestro actual gobernador fungía como Comisionado Residente, con la presunta obligación de hacer valer nuestros intereses y reclamos ante Wáshington.

¿Con qué cara el señor Luis Fortuño se atreve a acusar de intervencionismo y de actitudes dictatoriales al Presidente Chávez? ¿Con qué criterio o lógica afirma que no le corresponde a “nadie fuera de Puerto Rico” decidir sobre nosotros?

Luis Fortuño subió al poder en enero de 2009 tras unas elecciones arrolladoras. Menos de un año después se ha visto obligado a multiplicar su escolta personal, a reducir al mínimo sus apariciones públicas y huír de varias más. Ha redoblado la vigilancia y ha colocado un perímetro permanente alrededor de la histórica residencia de los gobernadores, La Fortaleza, para protegerse del mismo pueblo que lo eligió.

Señor Luis Fortuño: ¿con qué moral te atreves a hablar en nombre de un pueblo contra el que te has tenido que armar?


REFERENCIAS:
Advertencia de Fortuño a Chávez
http://www.elnuevodia.com/advertenciadefortunoachavez-638789.html

Populares critican gestión de Fortuño
http://www.vocero.com/noticia-1246-populares_critican_gestin_de_fortuo.html

‘Ojo federal’ a nexos de Chávez en la Isla
http://www.elnuevodia.com/ojofederalanexosdechavezenlaisla-639018.html

Parco el FBI sobre ‘conexión’ Venezuela
http://www.vocero.com/noticia-34866-parco_el_fbi_sobre_conexin_venezuela.html

No permitirá intromisión de Venezuela en status local
http://www.vocero.com/noticia-34828-_no_permitir_intromisin_de_venezuela_en_status_local.html

Subdirector del FBI a la Superintendencia de la Policía
http://www.elexpresso.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1557&Itemid=38

Comunicado de la Embajada de Venezuela en Washington
http://www.telesurtv.net/noticias/secciones/nota/12122-NN/comunicado-de-la-embajada-de-venezuela-en-washington/

RESOLUCION EN RECHAZO AL RECLAMO DE HUGO CHAVEZ DE INDEPENDENCIA PARA PUERTO RICO
http://www.pierluisi2008.com/ver_noticia.asp?id=139

Periodistas de Puerto Rico critican a parlamentario que continúa atacando al gobierno de Venezuela
http://www.aporrea.org/medios/n95465.html

Congresista estadounidense defensora de terrorista Posada Carriles impulsa resolución contra Venezuela
http://www.aporrea.org/tiburon/n63423.html

Arrecia el enfrentamiento mediático entre Chávez y Fortuño
http://dialogodigital.com/es/node/3356

Se "juye" el gobernador
http://pr.indymedia.org/news/2009/11/39965.php




H. CON. RES. 224. 109th CONGRESS.
Calling on the Government of Venezuela to uphold the human rights and civil liberties of the people of Venezuela.

H. CON. RES. 328. 109th CONGRESS.
Condemning the anti-democratic actions of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should strongly support the aspirations of the democratic forces in Venezuela.

H. CON. RES. 50. 110th CONGRESS.
Calling on the Government of Venezuela to uphold the human rights and civil liberties of the people of Venezuela.

H. CON. RES. 77. 110th CONGRESS.
Calling on the Government of Venezuela to respect a free and independent media and to avoid all acts of censorship against the media and free expression.

http://thomas.loc.gov/home/multicongress/multicongress.html



VIDEOS:

Jorge Ramos entrevista a Luis Fortuño
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-JIwo5UNhw

Entrevista a Kenneth McClintock el día del Paro Nacional, 15 de octubre
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Um2KBfqTq6M

Redoblada la seguridad en La Fortaleza
http://www.wapa.tv/noticias/politica/redoblada-la-seguridad-en-fortaleza/20091015172453

Secuencia fotográfica sobre el Paro Nacional del 15 de octubre
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gy7VgPzB1AE

Chávez reivindica la Independencia de Puerto Rico y la memoria de Filiberto Ojeda Ríos. 1 de 2.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hG3ehlp5tuM

Chávez reivindica la Independencia de Puerto Rico y la memoria de Filiberto Ojeda Ríos. 2 de 2.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOAegnFzSZY

agrega tus comentarios

Barack Obama brushes aside Lula Climate Proposals

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula de Silva isn't the only one not surprised about Barack Obama’s "Change" in United States policy. What more could we have expected from the United States? The people of Puerto Rican know all too well about the false promises made by the United States when it comes down to climant change. The people of Vieques would not have expected anything less. The people who live in Vieques continue to live in a land mine of exploded uranium shells and a radioactive waste land that has affected the coral reefs in the small island. Until this day the United States has not cleaned the mess it has made. Emerging reports are pointing out that many people living on the little island of Vieques have been diagnosed with cancer because of agents used by the United States military. The people of Puerto Rico already know about broken promises that are made by America's leadership when it comes down to climinate change policies. But could we have expected any less from a country that plunders the worlds resources? The people of Puerto Rico have something in common with President Lula de Silva and the people of Brazil. We salute our brothers in Latin America for standing on our side in saving humanity.

Lula Disappointed with U.S.-China Stance on Climate Change


ROME – Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said on Monday that he will telephone U.S. counterpart Barack Obama and China’s Hu Jintao to discuss the fight against climate change after Washington and Beijing agreed they are not ready to set targets for emissions reduction.

“I’m disappointed, but not surprised” at the agreement reached in Singapore between Obama and Hu, but “the United States and China must sooner or later propose their targets also, although it won’t be at the Copenhagen Conference,” Lula told reporters after meeting in Rome with Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi.

The United States and China, the world’s biggest polluters, on Sunday dealt a blow to the climate conference that will begin Dec. 7 in Copenhagen after informing the Danish government that it will not be possible at that summit to achieve an accord that will set targets for the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions, the main factor in global warming.

Lula emphasized that he will go to Copenhagen regardless to defend Brazil’s climate proposals.

Last Saturday, Lula and French President Nicolas Sarkozy noted that the final objective of the Copenhagen summit is a worldwide reduction in carbon dioxide emissions by at least 50 percent by 2050 compared to their level in 1990.

Lula is in Rome to attend the World Summit of the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization. EFE

http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=347481&CategoryId=14090